1. I think that the civilizations of ancient Egypt and ancient Sumer are both similar, however they did mot influence each other. Much of the reason for this is that Egypt was so far removed from civilization that it was hardly influenced, nor did it influence any other civilizations. This was because of so many land barriers that disconnected it form all other civilizations for a very long, so they remained one of least changed culture of the ancient times.
2. There are many different advantages and disadvantages of having a monarchy or a government. One reason to have a monarchy over a government is that the decisions can be made much faster, so in times of need, the ruler can at with supreme authority and get whatever needs to be done done. Also, in a monarchy, there is less complications in the ruling system, as to who has what power, because in a monarchy it is one man with all the power. In a government the power is distributed to many branches, and keeping them all in check becomes a struggle. However, if there is a corrupt ruler in charge, and no one is able to stand up to him, then the civilization can crumble, and the people can be oppressed. This is one reason not to have a monarchy. Also, in a government, there are many people keeping each other accountable, so it is harder for it to be shaken by corruption.
Good thoughts, Johnny.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you think that there were similarities in the aetiological myths of the Egyptians and the Sumerians, for example? What might C. S. Lewis make of these similarities in the context of his views on the one true myth?